It seems to promote newness over tried and tested thinking; innovation over reliability; and flexibility over foundations. Maybe in business this is beneficial but is the same true of the Church? Where deepening relationships is key often stability is valued and when it comes to longer term social transformation longevity is often better than a flash-in-the-pan hit and run approach.
In the past couple of weeks, on my commute to work, I’ve heard Elton John’s Step Into Christmas on a […]
As we head into December most people will start to turn their thoughts towards Christmas (though some have already been […]
A couple of months ago I was asked to speak on Nehemiah and so I dutifully went about thinking how […]
Today (July 17th), tucked away on BBC News website was a report on the Sunday Assembly meeting in Edinburgh.
Yesterday I attended the annual UWS Learning, Teaching, and Research Conference. In this blog, what follows is my own “thinking aloud” to think through two different, though I think related, ideas I heard during the day to ask ‘might that work for a church?’
If I had to choose one period of time to go back and visit, I think the 1960s would be high on my list. It’s not for the party of the swinging sixties, nor for the rise of the Beatles, and it’s also not for a nostalgic “life was better then”.
Simultaneously one of the best and worst questions that students in class ask is “but why?” Sometimes it can feel like you’re dealing with a troublesome tot “Why? Why? Why?” but it is a question that keeps returning me to think practically.
People sometimes ask me, why does studying theology help me to live as a Christian? Why does research on an obscure French philosopher help me to deal with real issues? I think this year’s Super Bowl helped me to articulate an answer…
When the aim of the Church is to rule over, rather than serve alongside others, we have to wonder what witness we bear….